Wednesday, October 25, 2006
23 employees reaching millions of users
Thursday, October 12, 2006
Friday, September 01, 2006
jumping fish
This picture took a while to get, but it was worth it. It was truly amazing to see how many salmon crowd the rivers in Alaska. You can literally stick your hand in and grab a fish. This was at the Russian River Falls. They recently had a bear grab some guy while he was sleeping in his tent. I guess it's pretty easy to see why there were bear hanging around:). To see the rest of the flickr pictures go here.
Sunday, August 27, 2006
the top of the lowari pass
The wedding
Thursday, July 13, 2006
le headbutt
Monday, June 12, 2006
Imba in the outdoors
Cherith, Dave, and I went out for a ride in the Kinnelon outback. Lots of deer, turkey and a tree stump that looked like a bear:). Afterwards we stopped by Villa Bosefski and hung out with the twins.
Wednesday, May 31, 2006
sydney harbor bridge
Monday, May 15, 2006
wikipedia and authenticity
This wired article is an interesting description of wikipedia contributors and how they contribute and 'own' content areas. Wikipedia's premise is that a crowd of interested and diverse people will produce better content than a small group of experts.
"Wikipedia offers 500,000 articles in English - compared with Britannica's 80,000 and Encarta's 4,500 - fashioned by more than 16,000 contributors."
After reading those statistics people wonder wikipedia handles slander or sloppy content and this quote tries to answer that.
"When MIT's Fernanda Vargas and IBM's Martin Wattenberg and Kushal Dave studied Wikipedia, they found that cases of mass deletions, a common form of vandalism, were corrected in a median time of 2.8 minutes. When an obscenity accompanied the mass deletion, the median time dropped to 1.7 minutes."
Of course, a series of folks have already aggregated this information and created a topic page on wikipedia covering the wikipedia peer review and authenticity topic.This wikipedia page provides links to the nature magazine article as well as lots of other third party peer reviews of wikipedia and Britannica.
This is the original article that compares Wikipedia and Britannica, followed by





